The SLOTH: time-lapse camera slider

IMG_80_project_summry_slide


Electrical components:

  • Arduino UNO
  • CNC shield
  • DRV8825 stepper driver
  • Makerbot mechanical end-stops (2x)
  • Nema 17 Stepper Motor
  • 12v DC power adapter

Mechanical components:

  • Stainless steel pipes 8mm diameter
  • Acrylic 5mm thick for laser cutting
  • PLA for 3D printing
  • Belt 6mm x 3m
  • Aluminum pulleys (2x)
  • Neewer camera tripod head
  • Nuts, bolts & washers…

Next steps

  • Add a speed control potentiometer
  • Optimize for battery powered components
  • Improve minor design issues: end-stop supports, electronics enclosure, easy to assemble platform, screws and press-fit tolerances, …
  • Add vertical rotation axis

Week 15: Machine design

During this week we followed the machine design class. You can see video here.

For this assignment we added a control system to our camera time-lapse dolly! :)

This page is about the 1st part of the process in the group comprised by: Ilias Bartolini, Marta Bocos, André Pulcino, Óscar González

Job Split

We initially learned how to use a stepper motor and make it move as wished with an Arduino CNC shield. For this, Ilias’s job started the motors and made them move for the first time.

Later on, we all colaborated as follows:

  • Marta and Ilias to set up the motors and fit up the endstops in place
  • Óscar and Andre to program the board and define the interaction with the endstops

Using a stepper motor

First simple example we took ad Arduino CNC shield with a DRV8825 stepper motor driver.

A good introductory guide to have our example working is this.

Documentation for the DRV8825 features and pinout is available here.
Documentation for the Arduino CNC shiled is available here.

The DRV8825 driver allow for various step resolution which can be configured via the jumpers on the CNC shield: Screenshot_40_Stepper_motor_resolution

We picked the higher resolution and then tested with the sample code from the tutorial modified as below:

#define EN        8
//Direction pin
#define X_DIR     5
//Step pin
#define X_STP     2
//DRV8825
int delayTime=3200; //Delay between each pause (uS)
int steps=6400;// Steps to move

void move(boolean dir, byte dirPin, byte stepperPin, int steps)
{
  digitalWrite(dirPin, dir);
  delay(100);
  for (int i = 0; i < steps; i++) {
    digitalWrite(stepperPin, HIGH);
    delayMicroseconds(delayTime);
    digitalWrite(stepperPin, LOW);
    delayMicroseconds(delayTime);
  }
}

void setup(){
  pinMode(X_DIR, OUTPUT); pinMode(X_STP, OUTPUT);
  pinMode(EN, OUTPUT);
  digitalWrite(EN, LOW);
}

void loop(){
  move(false, X_DIR, X_STP, steps); //X, Clockwise
  delay(1000);
  move(true, X_DIR, X_STP, steps); //X, Counterclockwise
  delay(1000);

Here is the result.


Testing the motor on our machine

First of all we had to register the torque/current limit supplied to the motor by the stepper driver. The DRV8825 has a potentiometer which lets you regulate this setting. Later on I found this useful guide for this process.

After registering the current limit here is the functioning prototype assembled on our machine.


A little bit of adjustment was necessary to find the correct steps frequency and belt tension to avoid vibrations but still have a slow movement of the platform.

Adding endstops

We started thiking at different ways to add the endstops to the dolly structure and ended up with a simple glue solution :) IMG_42_Endstop

Here is the endstop assembled with the machine. IMG_43_Endstop_assembled


Firmware

In terms of firmware, we had a look at the possibilities of using the end-stops with an ISR (Interrupt Service Routine), in order to do it the neat way:

We will be using an Arduino Uno with an ATMEGA328P-PU, which has a wide range of digital pins to be used. However, not all the pins can be used for an Interrupt with the attachInterrupt() function as stated in this link, and the hat we are using is definitively not using only those (2 and 3). Therefore, we would need to use the ISR in a different way. One good documentation about it is the one from Nick Gammon’s. From his site, a brief description of interrupts would define them as a way to let you respond to “external” events while doing something else.

Interrupt Schema

For the ATMEGA328, below there is a list of available interrupts, in order of priority:

 1  Reset
 2  External Interrupt Request 0  (pin D2)          (INT0_vect)
 3  External Interrupt Request 1  (pin D3)          (INT1_vect)
 4  Pin Change Interrupt Request 0 (pins D8 to D13) (PCINT0_vect)
 5  Pin Change Interrupt Request 1 (pins A0 to A5)  (PCINT1_vect)
 6  Pin Change Interrupt Request 2 (pins D0 to D7)  (PCINT2_vect)
 7  Watchdog Time-out Interrupt                     (WDT_vect)
 8  Timer/Counter2 Compare Match A                  (TIMER2_COMPA_vect)
 9  Timer/Counter2 Compare Match B                  (TIMER2_COMPB_vect)
10  Timer/Counter2 Overflow                         (TIMER2_OVF_vect)
11  Timer/Counter1 Capture Event                    (TIMER1_CAPT_vect)
12  Timer/Counter1 Compare Match A                  (TIMER1_COMPA_vect)
13  Timer/Counter1 Compare Match B                  (TIMER1_COMPB_vect)
14  Timer/Counter1 Overflow                         (TIMER1_OVF_vect)
15  Timer/Counter0 Compare Match A                  (TIMER0_COMPA_vect)
16  Timer/Counter0 Compare Match B                  (TIMER0_COMPB_vect)
17  Timer/Counter0 Overflow                         (TIMER0_OVF_vect)
18  SPI Serial Transfer Complete                    (SPI_STC_vect)
19  USART Rx Complete                               (USART_RX_vect)
20  USART, Data Register Empty                      (USART_UDRE_vect)
21  USART, Tx Complete                              (USART_TX_vect)
22  ADC Conversion Complete                         (ADC_vect)
23  EEPROM Ready                                    (EE_READY_vect)
24  Analog Comparator                               (ANALOG_COMP_vect)
25  2-wire Serial Interface  (I2C)                  (TWI_vect)
26  Store Program Memory Ready                      (SPM_READY_vect)

The D2 and D3 pins are the ones mentioned in the Arduino documentation. However, we will be using the pins D8 to D13 with the PCINT0_vect services. For that we will have to write our own strategy, and to make it right we used the one from grbl, first by defining an interrupt function on the PCINT0_vect pins:

#define LIMIT_INT_vect   PCINT0_vect

ISR(LIMIT_INT_vect) // DEFAULT: Limit pin change interrupt process.
{

uint8_t state = limits_get_state();
  switch (state) {
      case 1:
        dir = false;
        break;
      case 0:
        dir = true;
        break;
  }
}

This function checks the status of the pins whenever triggered via the function limits_get_state():

uint8_t limits_get_state()
{
  uint8_t limit_state = 2;

  if (digitalRead(9)==HIGH && digitalRead(10)==LOW){
    limit_state = 1;
  }
  if (digitalRead(9) == LOW && digitalRead(10)==HIGH) {
    limit_state = 0;
  }

  // The first time we home, we don't do it again
  if (!home){
    home = true;
  }

  return(limit_state);
}

This surely can be done in a much more efficient way, but it serves our purposes: we are checking every time an ISR is coming on the digital pins of PCINT0vect which one of the two are HIGH, either the pin 9 or the pin 10. In case of not having done the _homing yet, we set the home flag to true, to change the movement settings from fast to slow. The variable containing which direction is the motor turning is changed accordingly and is sent in the main loop:

void loop(){

  //While not homed, move fast!
  while (home==false) {
    move(dir,X_DIR, X_STP, stepsFast, delayTimeFast);
  }

  //Now move nicely
  move(dir, X_DIR, X_STP, stepsSlow, delayTimeSlow); //X, Clockwise

}

Finally, as a remark, the registers are enabled in the setup() function as defined below:

#define LIMIT_DDR        DDRB
#define LIMIT_PIN        PINB
#define LIMIT_PORT       PORTB
#define X_LIMIT_BIT      1  // Uno Digital Pin 9
#define Y_LIMIT_BIT      2  // Uno Digital Pin 10
#define LIMIT_MASK ((1<<X_LIMIT_BIT)|(1<<Y_LIMIT_BIT)) // All limit bits
#define LIMIT_INT        PCIE0  // Pin change interrupt enable pin
#define LIMIT_PCMSK      PCMSK0 // Pin change interrupt register

void limits_init()
{
  LIMIT_DDR &= ~(LIMIT_MASK); // Set as input pins

  LIMIT_PORT |= (LIMIT_MASK);  // Enable internal pull-up resistors. Normal high operation.

  LIMIT_PCMSK |= LIMIT_MASK; // Enable specific pins of the Pin Change Interrupt
  PCICR |= (1 << LIMIT_INT); // Enable Pin Change Interrupt

}

This turns to do the following:

Download Sources (.zip archive)

Final result

And now! The final result of our work!

IMG_50_Final_assembled_slider

IMG_51_Final_assembled_slider

And here a sample video of our Sloth time-lapse recording!!!
\o/ \o/



Lessons learned

  1. How to drive a stepper motor! :)
  2. When we built our final structure, we made assumptions about the motor and drive mechanism: ideally we should be iterating on the mechanical structure once we learned about the components used.
  3. Driving a single motor is quite easy in code and we do not require a more complex CNC shield for this.

Next steps

  • Add a speed control potentiometer.
  • Optimize for battery powered components.
  • Try smaller 5V stepper motor with gearing: eg. this.
  • Try wiring the stepper driver without using the CNC shield.
  • Design a better enclosure and wiring of the electronic parts.

Week 14: Mechanical design

This week we followed the mechanical design class. You can see video here.

For this assignment we decided to build a camera time-lapse dolly! :) This page is about the 1st part of the process in the group comprised by: Ilias Bartolini, Marta Bocos, André Pulcino, Óscar González

Concept

We would like the slider to have at least two controlled axis: (1) an horizontal rail and (2) and vertical camera rotation.

The camera would be placed on a flat plate and be supported by a conventional tripod head, attached to the plate by a screw. The plate would be sliding onto rails or tracks, and this would be moved by a stepper motor at the end of the rails. The rotation along the vertical axis would be done by a second servo motor, initially attached to the plate itself.

After looking at the various sample projects we started sketching together a solution. Screenshot_2_Refined_sketch

Below there is an initial list of components:

  • Pipes: steel 8mm available at the lab
  • Belt + pulleys: 6mm wide belt + pulleys
  • End supports: to be laser cut with acrylic + 3D printed components
  • Camera holder (PanaVise): to buy
  • x1 Stepper motor (rails)
  • x1 Servo motor (camera rotation)

Job Split

This week was a bit difficult for us in terms of planning because it happened to be a very busy / travelling week for all… Nevertheless, we managed to work altogether after some emails and arrangement.

We initially planned to execute it all via 3D printing, but as explained below, it would have ended up being a too long process and we decided to use both, laser and 3D printed parts. For this week, the initial concept was done by Andre, Marta and Ilias and the initial design in Fusion360 by Andre. Once things started rolling, the split was done as follows:

  • Andre in charge of designing the 3D printed parts in Fusion360
  • Ilias in charge of designing the laser cut parts
  • Marta in charge of laser cutting them with Ilias
  • Óscar in charge of the mechanical design of the pieces

The first week was then dedicated to manage some iterations of the mechanical design, with several trials of the laser cut parts and 3d printing. During this week, we learned that different fabrication processes can be joined to make a faster, more robust design, but that in some circumstances, the slowest process can delay things a bit (in this case 3D printing).

1st Iteration: CAD

Below we detail a first sketch of this model in CAD. These parts would have taken long time to print (more than 2 days to have all of them ready).

Screenshot_4_CAD_design Screenshot_5_CAD_design Screenshot_6_CAD_design Screenshot_7_CAD_design Screenshot_8_CAD_design

Therefore, we decided therefore to go back to pen and paper, and think how we could save some time.

2nd Iteration:

In this section, we will describe the final solution we went for. We took inspiration from the 3D printers mechanical design such as the HyperCube Evolution and some other RepRap solutions.

The shafts would be held by the rail ends with this solution, combining 5mm acrylic and 3D printing. We decided to use 3D printed parts to hold in the shafts, making use of the material’s flexibility to tighten in the shaft:

Screenshot_9a_Sketch_design2 Screenshot_9b_Sketch_design2 Screenshot_9c_Sketch_design2

The plate would be held by a similar solution to this one. We will be using 4x linear bearings in two separate modules to be attached to the shaft.

Finally, the belt would be pulling from this type of solution, so that we guarantee the belt tightening:

Screenshot_9d_Sketch_design2

Laser cutting parts

We quickly designed few new parts to build a quick prototype of the foot of our machine:

Screenshot_10_Laser_cut_part Screenshot_11_Laser_cut_part Screenshot_12_Laser_cut_parts

And assembled it in the afternoon to have an idea of how it would look like:

IMG_13_plywood_prototype IMG_14_plywood_prototype IMG_15_plywood_prototype_v1

Quickly prototyping with laser cutting and plywood allowed us to quickly iterate on our design.

First we fixed the motor positioning, the screws holes tolerances, chamfers and dogbones: IMG_16_plywood_prototype_v3

In a following iteration we increased the support plate width for the motor, added lateral-bottom pressfit parts, increased the dogbones sizes: IMG_17_plywood_prototype_v4

Finally we fixed the belt hole and a mistake between the bottom support plate width and the new lateral-bottom pressfit parts: IMG_18_plywood_prototype_v5

The camera support plate also went through a couple of iterations while we designed our 3D printed parts to attach to the pipes and belt: IMG_19_plywood_prototype

At this point we were ready for cutting the prototype in acrylic material.

Download Sources (.zip archive)

Characterising acrylic material

We started testing the following setting for acrylic based on other students experience

PowerSpeedPPI/Hz
1000.62500

IMG_20_characterize_acrylic_lasercut

After few test we ended with

PowerSpeedPPI/Hz
1000.4570000

Then we checked the kerf for the material.

IMG_21_characterize_acrylic_lasercut

We found that the slots between 5.1mm and 5.2mm are the one with the best press fit. We started designing our model with a kerf between 0.05mm and 0.1mm: that is 0.075mm

3D printing parts

We will be using the Makerbot 3D printer. The settings used for these parts are the following:

  • Material: white PLA
  • Infill: 20% - Cubic
  • Layer height: 0.15mm
  • Initial layer height: 0.3mm
  • Line width: 0.4mm
  • Wall line count: 3mm
  • Printing temperature: 205degC
  • Filament: 1.75mm
  • Flow 100%
  • Travel Speed: 120mm/s
  • Print speed: 60mm/s
  • Retraction: 6.5mm

Below we detail the 3D printing components we will be using:

Shaft support:

Screenshot_22a_Leg_support_model

Bearing and belt support for the moving plate: Screenshot_22b_Plate_support_model Screenshot_22c_Plate_support_model

These were all printed with white PLA, with a very painful adjustment process to make it print properly. We also tested which was the best printing direction in order to best use the mechanical properties of the material.

Below some results:

IMG_25_3D_printed_parts

IMG_26_3D_printed_parts

IMG_27_3D_printed_parts

IMG_28_3D_printed_parts IMG_29_3D_printed_parts

Download Sources (.zip archive)

Putting it all together

Pulleys, screws, etc.

IMG_40_Assembling

IMG_41_Assembling

Lessons learned

  1. Visualising things early even with simple sketches gets more important when more people are working together as a team;
  2. For the purpose of the first few prototypes with the laser cutter we could have easily used cardboard instead of plywood;
  3. 3D printing process get a lot slower with the volume of the pieces to print and the probability of failure makes it less valuable for quick iterative prototyping;
  4. Mechanical properties of 3D printed material relies upon highly on layer height, printing direction and positioning of the piece on the printing plate;
  5. Common mechanical considerations like fillets and avoiding stress concentrations should be taken even more into account with 3D printing;
  6. The 3D parts we have printed have considerably shrunk in some of their holes, probably due to the melting and settlement of the PLA. It made some hole tighter than we expected, which helped in some cases to create more tension and stability. But, as a rule of thumb, 0.5mm of tolerance have been added to the planned holes.

Next steps

  • Easy to assemble platform: the clamps opening at the bottom of the platform could be wide enough to allow it to be easily detachable: currently we need to remove the foot.
  • Improve the belt tensioning mechanism with a screw & bolt that allow an easy regulation.
  • Check press-fit tolerances and design a way to block the bottom layer of the feet.
  • Test a different solution with rails instead of pipes to limit the bending of the structure.

Pagination